 | | Re: New Subpart: chains1.dat: single link
|
|
(...) I did not know that. I'll post an update in a couple of days. (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Subpart: chains1.dat: single link
|
|
(...) Hmmm... I'll have to take a look. Thanks. (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another L3PAO update
|
|
(...) I was waiting for someone to push me to do that ;) Leave it to you to try and get me to be the best programmer I can be.. hehe (did you see my post about adding "camera" object types as .DATs and then having L3P use them for camera (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LGEO and L3P (Where is Lutz Uhlmann?)
|
|
More than a year ago Lutz Uhlmann agreed that L3P could reference his high quality LGEO pov parts. He promissed to send some info regarding the binary format of the element table files. However, I have not heard from him since despite several mails. (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: l3p question
|
|
Eduardo V asked: (...) Sorry, no. You'll have to e.g. "uncomment" sections (steps) directly in the POV file. /Lars (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: General question
|
|
(...) Yes, I put it into v1.2 20000616. I didn't mention it though, I was curious if anyone noticed :-) However, I'll change it back in v1.3 according to (URL) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Follow up to Camera Tricks [DAT]
|
|
Well, a number of times since L3P was announced back in August 1998 I have had discussions with several people about ways to control the camera. The basic idea of L3P was to automate the camera setting to what (I suppose) is the most common (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Follow up to Camera Tricks
|
|
(...) Well, I think of it the other way around! See (URL) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PAdd-On v1.2.5 is up (was: Bug in L3PAO...)
|
|
(...) I think I should stress that L3P looks in the current directory (where it is launched) and not where l3p.exe is. /Lars (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another L3PAO update
|
|
(...) Well, seems like an easy task for a program too! Backwards compatibility is very nice (knock knock :-) /Lars (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | St. Marks Cathedral .dat file [DAT]
|
|
Hi, I already posted this to lugnet.build, but some people requested the .dat file, so here it is. Here is a link to the pictures (generated with POV-RAY): (URL) need the latest parts update from www.ldraw.com. Note that the .dat file is just a (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: How do I speed things up ?
|
|
"Andy Lynch" <andy@andyandjackie.com> wrote in message news:004b01c0426c$20...lth.com... (...) pieces (...) minimize (...) the (...) Then (...) now (...) DAT (...) Thanks for this very good tip. -John Van (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: General question
|
|
"Joel Hoornbeek" <joel@webaccess.net> wrote in message news:G3Auqz.FMI@lugnet.com... (...) as (...) version (...) This really should be changed. I had a conversation with TLC's intellectual property attorney over this issue. She requested we NOT put (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: I finally used MLCAD!
|
|
(...) Yes! This bothers me (and confuses my sons) everytime we use MLCAD. I'm really sorry, Micheal, but I *don't* want MLCAD to be the default option for .DAT and .MPD files. (...) I agree, I like the way LEdit handles this. But it's not too hard (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Correct attribution? (was Re: Parts tracker needs more visibility
|
|
(...) Start by reorganizing the lugnet.cad.* newsgroups. I realize that's not going to happen, but that would be the best place to start. (...) It is icky that stuff is duplicated, but it's not really clear where *parts* *development* stuff should (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Subpart: chains1.dat: single link
|
|
(...) All of your type-"2" lines need to be changed to type-"5" _conditional_ lines. That is the way to do "edges" for "curved" surfaces in LDraw. For a example of type-"5" lines, look at the promitives for a Cylinder (1-4cyli.dat) and a Sphere (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Subpart: chains1.dat: single link
|
|
(...) Nice, but one quadrant looks a bit squirrely. I've been fiddling with double buffered model spinning in ldglite, so just to be sure I looked at in l3lab too. Don (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: chain.dat [DAT]
|
|
Here it is. I'm not exactly sure what to call this, but it is indeed a chain. LMKWYT 0 Chain 0 Name: chain.dat 0 Author: Matt Schild 0 Unofficial Model 1 16 -160 0 60 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 s\chains2.dat 1 16 -144 2 60 0 -1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 s\chains1.dat (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Subpart: chains2.dat: chain end with stud [DAT]
|
|
The whole assembly follows immediately. LMKWYT 0 chain end 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION CONFIG 0 1 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 peghole.dat 1 16 0 -4 0 0.75 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0.75 peghole.dat 1 16 0 -4 0 4.5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4.5 (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Subpart: chains1.dat: single link [DAT]
|
|
The end and the whole assembly coming right up. LMKWYT 0 chain link 0 Name: chains1.dat 0 Author: Matt Schild 0 Unofficial Model 4 16 0 3 0 0 3.04 0.19 0.38 2.92 0 0.4 2.96 0.19 4 16 0 3.15 0.35 0 3.04 0.19 0.44 3.06 0.35 0.4 2.96 0.19 4 16 0 3.15 (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
