 | | Re: Things for the next part update
|
|
(...) I agree, but I can go with the flow on this one. I've always written my meta-commands in uppercase, but written my programs to recognize either. Steve -- A big fan of case-INsensitivity since Modula-2 (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) LDLite has always been slightly flakey on MPD files. I think v1.6 is better than v1.5, but I'm not in a position to make absolute statements--I use L3Lab these days. Steve (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) I've tried with the current version and I get the same result. If I remove the the piece at which LDLite stops (a 3024, plate 1x1), it jumps to the next submodel (the ascent stage) and renders this, but only to a certain point also. No matter (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) I've tried with the current version and I get the same result. If I remove the the piece at which LDLite stops (a 3024, plate 1x1), it jumps to the next submodel (the ascent stage) and renders this, but only to a certain point also. No matter (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) Hmmm. I wonder why L3Lab works where LDLite breaks. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
