 | | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) I only have access to Linux, you'll have to compile it yourself but it should be very easy. If the server is running on a high endian machine (most non-Intel CPUs) then it won't run, I still need to fix a few things but work and Mindstorms (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | (Some) Parts which are in the update-pipeline
|
|
As requested, here is a list of part-files which are in the queue for the 2000-02 update. These are files which were intended for 2000-01, but I either didn't have a chance to review them, or there was some hold-up in the process. Files which were (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: open source & inventory ?
|
|
unfortunately, both sites seem to be no longer available. :-( (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) Sure! I was just following up on the previous article, which talked about using L3Lab under Wine. Fredrik (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) Hmm. There's a couple of problems with your examples. In overdraw2.png, you are having the quad intersect the circle exactly at two vertices. If the quad was a bit narrower, you would need to split the two original triangles, retaining the (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
(...) No, it's a good thing to have a program to identify these things. Even though edges-only primitives can't be BFC'ed, I'm guessing there could be other advantages to avoiding singular matrices, and few disadvantages. Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
|
(...) OK, that sounds reasonable -- it's something that a clean-up program could look for, even though it's not practical for a rendering program to do the same. Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) Whew! Only one of those files is mine! :\ (...) True. (...) I don't think that's necessary. If a subfile is not certified, then the renderer will not apply BFC processing to the subfile. Besides, if having all subfiles certified was a (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: StarWars rendered images
|
|
(...) Those are awesome! I was just showing them to everyone at work. KL (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Smoke-Clear color code (was: Problem with 1-4con1.dat)
|
|
(...) I don't think there is a sanctioned color-code yet ... checking ... checking ... nope, nothing in the color table in the FAQ. Hear Ye! Hear Ye! Unless someone complains otherwise, the proper LDraw color-code for 'smoked-transparent', AKA (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | StarWars rendered images
|
|
I updated my StarWars rendered images at: (URL) X-Wing from set 7140. George (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray) !
|
| |
| | StarWars rendered images
|
|
I updated my StarWars rendered images at: (URL) with X-Wing from set 7140. George (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) Ooooh Solaris. Could you compile ldglite for Solaris and let me know what opengl extensions it lists? I think this is one of the platforms that supports the HP_OCCLUSION_TEST extension that I've been dying to try out. Sorry about butting in on (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: next ldraw part update, space/minifig accessories?
|
|
hi steve, and thanks for the response. i've been watching the voting thread. in your original announcement you said it would be a "fairly small update" of parts but that is one jam-packed update of great stuff! big thanks to you and all of the (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) Since the goal is to maximize performance, wine/dosemu isn't really a desirable solution. KL (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) The server is running FreeBSD 3.2. Can you make a binary for that platform? How about Solaris 2.6/7 ? KL (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: what is legos official view of ldraw?
|
|
(...) I'd say it would be ok even then, imo. (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw Help Desk/Reference
|
|
Tim, I thought you once mentioned an 'under development' area on ldraw.org. Does this area exist, or am I mis-remembering? Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: next ldraw part update, space/minifig accessories?
|
|
(...) Yes. :) (...) At some point, the parts in the Castle, Town, and Space categories need to be reorganized, moved to other categories. Generally, the theme-based groups make parts harder to find. Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Syntax error in official part 754.dat?
|
|
(...) There was a discussion about this awhile ago. Since LDraw will interpret these lines as subfile commands, the lines are syntactically correct. Badly formed, but not invalid. And 754.dat is getting fixed in the 2000-01 update! Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
