To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / *11355 (-10)
  Minifig Torso With Wolfpack Pattern  [DAT]
 
0 Minifig Torso With Wolfpack Pattern 0 Name: 973p04.dat 0 Author: Steve Bliss (torso) 0 Author: Chris Dee (pattern) 0 Author: Jonathan Wilson (placement) 0 Unofficial Element 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\973s01.dat 1 383 0 12 0 0.50 0 0 0 0.50 0 (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Minifig Torso With Black Falcon Pattern (silver subpart)  [DAT]
 
0 Minifig Torso With Black Falcon Pattern (silver subpart) 0 Name: 973p04a.dat 0 Author: Steve Bliss (torso) 0 Author: Chris Dee (pattern) 0 Author: Jonathan Wilson (placement) 0 Unofficial Element 4 16 -8.50 6.50 -10 -10 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 6.50 -10 4 (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Minifig Torso With Black Falcon Pattern  [DAT]
 
0 Minifig Torso With Black Falcon Pattern 0 Name: 973p04.dat 0 Author: Steve Bliss (torso) 0 Author: Chris Dee (pattern) 0 Author: Jonathan Wilson (placement) 0 Unofficial Element 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\973s01.dat 1 383 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: New Part: Castle Shield with Wolfpack Pattern
 
(...) So it's obvious what I copied from one part to the other, huh! Thanks for making the fixes - I'll make sure the revised versions go in for the voting. Chris (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: New Part: Castle Shield with Black Falcon Pattern
 
(...) I'll check all of these out - guess I skimped on the QA with "L3P -check". Apologies, Chris (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Some Words To BFC
 
(...) the (...) therefor (...) I would suggest to make the meta-commands for the renderer as simple as possible and move all other corrections to external programs or functions. I believe that what we have of BFC in MLCad for example is good enough (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Some Words To BFC
 
OK. I've thought about most of John's posting, and I think I'm ready to make an intelligible response. Just to be sure I caught everything, here's a (hopefully quick) re-iteration. The major differences between John's proposal and the proposal I (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Some Words To BFC
 
(...) What would you suggest simplifying or removing? (...) How do you mean? What is a 'bad definition' in a matrix? Having a negative determinant? And what do you have to do to correct it? My understanding was that the rendering program could (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Some Words To BFC
 
(...) That's not always possible, as has been discussed. And is still being discussed... (...) Yeah, that's a possibility. (...) OK, but that's a complication for the rendering engine. It would have to check the actual path of each file, after the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Some Words To BFC
 
(...) Good point. We definitely *should* muddy this discussion up with some real facts. ;) (...) Yes and no. Something that's easy to do is definitely less of a 'requirement' than something that's a lot of work. But it's still a requirement, placed (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR