|
|
 | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| (...) but it seams to be damaged, but I was able to get the ideia. (...) Well this is exactly what I have been researching for a month now ! and believe me to be able to correct files 100% is almost impossible, due to the way the files are built. (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| Rui Martins <Rui.Martins@link.pt> wrote in message news:Pine.GSU.4.10.1...0@is-sv... (...) saying, (...) subfiles (...) those (...) fixed. (...) restrictions, (...) it. (...) until (...) the (...) allows (...) a (...) apply), (...) user. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Performance Improvement
|
| (...) In this case you should be using 3-4disc.dat (rotate it if necessary). (...) Maybe for this case there should be a "5-8disc.dat" But that would probably mean changes to already made parts. (...) This is what is generally called a T junction, (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| (...) Yes, the correct and safe assumption is CLIPPING DISABLED. (...) This is just a Hack, you assume that a model file is compliant, or by checking its pathname or because it's the root of the branches. But this doesn't even work very wheel, if (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| (...) I don't think they should. Parts authors are (probably) motivated by their interest for the LDraw format, so I would expect a few to handle the BFC-compliance of their parts. But to demand that everybody do this would probably exclude far to (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
