 | | Re: MPD spec
|
|
(...) I believe the answer would be Yes and Yes. Steve (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner wrote... (...) No, the mathematics is easy, just a simple matrix in POV. But Lutz mentioned something about a special index file and flags for transparent parts and slopes. And I can see LeoCAD's code to read the file. But I would (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
(...) I'ts not too difficult to incorporate LGEO and L3P in the same POV file. I've done it once to get a high level of details in a wallpaper rendering: (URL) was surprised that noone mentioned this.) What you basically need to do to cram LGEO (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
Chuck Sommerville wrote... (...) Good idea, I have thought of it myself too :-) But I have postponed the implementation because I was hoping for an integration of LGEO and L3P: the effort writing POV replacements for LDraw parts naturally belongs in (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
George GeoMan wrote... (...) The good thing about L3P: it is INDEPENDENT of part updates. The not so good thing about L3P: some rounded parts look egdy/angular. /Lars (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
