To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.militaryOpen lugnet.build.military in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Military / 881
880  |  882
Subject: 
Re: HMLS Snottler III
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 23:56:22 GMT
Viewed: 
353 times
  
In lugnet.build.military, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
  Every iteration of the Almighty Snottler (why does that sound so
  disgusting when I say it?  ;) ) is more impressive than the one
  before.
Thanks!

  I like the way you've upscaled this version, which allows
  you to really explore the detail and make the ship "correct" both
  in body form and in its structures in spite of compression issues.
  The missile housing fore of the conning tower is an especially neat
  touch.  The only point where scale begins to break down is with the
  heliport--would it be possible to recess the hangar into the hull,
  or rebuild the chopper for a narrower housing (the Sea Kings do,
  in fact, fold rotors for stowage)?  An after structure could then
  dominate the silhouette very nicely and break up the rectilinear
  hangar effect.

The helicopter is about as small as I could get it, while preserving the
general shape, side-by-side seating, and clearance underneath for the torpedo.

The hangar could be narrowed (by four studs if necessary - I left clearance
in the hangar for workbenches and workspace), and shortened by two studs.
Unfortunately, the roof cannot be lowered... though, as you point out, the
floor could be (losing head room in the engine room and crew accomodations
below). Hmmmm. I'd have to incorporate a ramp up to the helipad though.

  Incidentally, have you looked into getting plans of the predecessors
  of those actual ships?
I have looked into it, but not gone as far as getting them...  the Royal
Australian Navy offers drawings of the ANZAC, FFG and older frigates
(http://www.navy.gov.au/models/modelff.html). I spent a lot of time looking
out my office window visiting ANZAC frigates on Sydney Harbour....

(I've got to look at something out there now the Bounty replica is away!)

  I know those currently operational must be
  classified, but I know that the Smithsonian and NARA in the United
  States do offer plans of the first generation of flare-bow FFGs from
  the USN.  Those should give you frame-by-frame hull cross-sections
  which are an excellent guide--I'm using _Takao's_ frame sections for
  my own reference, though I did not get those from an archival source.
  (I also mention this because the plans are also available for older
  ships--including 18th-century craft, both military and civilian--and
  given the complexity of the curves you'll be dealing with, the more
  the relief drawings, the better!)

  Your SNOT-sailing-ship project is something I find intriguing!  I'd
  harbored (ha!) dreams of producing a mostly-brown frigate or galleon;
  one day, I may still do it.  But the principle should be sound, if
  collecting the requisite amount of the right colors to do it is harder.

I think the most difficult part will be producing the requisite beam,
without overly 'stepping' the bow. I've considered using SNOT hinges to
assist... with studs pointing outwards at the sides, curving around to studs
forward at the front.

  I've logicked a fair amount of the engineering out in idle moments
  at departmental meetings and waiting rooms, so if you want to brain-
  storm feel free to email.  Alas, I'm not planning to actually build
  one before I leave in August, so any speculations won't have the benefit
  of practice.  But sure as shootin' I'd adore seeing a SNOT pirate!
  Hm, now THAT sounds disgusting.

  (Incidentally, I'm producing the new cruiser to be "revealable"--that
  is, it can be opened up laterally to expose the interior, but off-
  center so that centerline machinery and ducting (funnels, barbettes,
  etc.) won't have to be split.  So this has brought on new and painful
  engineering problems that might be of interest--or at least their
  solutions might be.)

Definitely! I need better engineering all round. I was removing the Snottler
from its berth atop a 6' bookshelf on the weekend, and part of the centre
section decided to give way... fortunately family members were on hand to
provide assistance...


  I'm looking forward to Snottler IV:  Electric Boogaloo!  ;)

Well, I'm currently working on my sailing fleet (the Eponine's being rebuilt
from Brig to Frigate) for a French expedition to the South Seas, but the
more I think about it, the more likely the Snottler successor (with a
recessed hangar) will be the project after that.

Cheers

Richie Dulin



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: HMLS Snottler III
 
(...) < (snippage) (...) Richie- Every iteration of the Almighty Snottler (why does that sound so disgusting when I say it? ;) ) is more impressive than the one before. I like the way you've upscaled this version, which allows you to really explore (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.build.military)

6 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR