|
|
 | | Re: spitfire MOC
|
| (...) you'v got me there. I checked out a number of the links you provided (thanks!), and yes, indeed they all prove my MOC correct. I guess I'll just have to post the reference I used.... or just forget about it, since I appear to have done right (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
| | | | | Re: spitfire MOC
|
| (...) I'm not sure what images you used as reference, but take a look at these: (URL) later variants of the Spitfire may have had the outward folding gear, but in all of the images I can find it features inward folding gear; exactly as you portrayed (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
| | | | | Re: spitfire MOC
|
| In lugnet.build.military, Drew Lawrence writes: <snip> (...) thanks muchly! I appreciate you taking the time to re-visit. (...) Huh. Not according to the pics I saw (after the fact). They hinged just outside the wing guns, and folded in, not quite (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
| | | | | Re: spitfire MOC
|
| (...) Hey, thanks very much! Again, as far as studs-not-on-top goes, this is one of the sturdiest models I've made! I appreciate the comments, stuart (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
| | | | | Re: spitfire MOC
|
| Not to get too off-topic, but.... (...) I don't quite know what to say except sorry-- I run Net 4.6 and it's okay, but Netscape 4.x is notoriously buggy.... (...) Well, I'll post to brickshelf and the site simultaneously from now on. (...) yeah, (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
|
