 | | Re: Vought F-4 Corsair
|
|
An excellent model, in a number of ways. I agree about the wings being too short, but I think you did a great job of capturing the angles at the base of the wings, which is probably the hardest part of the Corsair. One note about nomenclature (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Take Two - Heinkel He219 WWII German Nightfighter
|
|
(...) I had a similar problem in an early version of my Navy patrol bomber, and fixed it when I realized that my wings were too thin. I ended up making the wings 3 bricks thick, and the scale was much more accurate. Now your wings won't be nearly (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Take Two - Heinkel He219 WWII German Nightfighter
|
|
(...) Wow! That's incredible! How did you get it to balance on its wheels? Looks like you fixed the engines too, so they don't rotate with the prop (How'd you do it?). Very well done. Now if you really want a challenge, make the landing gear (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
Welcome to Lugnet!! your tank is great! I love the detail in the tread area. Gary Tosiaki Nisiyori <tm960084@yahoo.co.jp> wrote in message news:Gn63sr.6Hn@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
Hey Tosiaki, Always interesting to see other people's Lego versions of a model. You can see my Sherman at: (URL) forward to seeing more stuff from you. Chris Churchill Mechanized Brick (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
(...) My only complaint is that there aren't enough views! That's a fantastic model, and three pictures don't do it justice. The detail is wonderful; I especially like the supports for the treads and the use of the cylindrical engine in the front. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
How do you do [ everybody ]. You who were looking at my models, thank you. My new work "Sherman" was registered into BrickShelf . (URL) it adds later, please look forward to the new picture. I am waiting for your comment. (23 years ago, 21-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Vought F-4 Corsair
|
|
(...) I do, actually. It's not in my brickshelf account, yet. I need to redesign my whole web page but I just haven't made the time. (URL) the intro to the page. I did a cheesy diorama for it, as well. Just some things I had that I thought would fit (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | WWII Brikwars (was Re: Vought F-4 Corsair)
|
|
(...) Ahhhh :) Actually, Eric Joslin and I did exactly that last year (when I was just embarking upon my WWII modeling frenzy!). Eric did a fantastic 1950s-comic-book-style newsreel writeup[1]: (URL) thread in which we discuss the anachronistic (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | Re: Vought F-4 Corsair
|
|
(...) Hey, you built an F-4 too? I didn't know that. Its not on your BrickShelf gallery - do you have pictures? (...) Actually, the 3-bladed prop is WW2-era accurate. The 4 bladed prop wasn't added onto the F-4 until it served as a ground attack / (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Vought F-4 Corsair
|
|
(...) Drew!! From one F-4 builder to another, well done! I wish I had some of those black props for myself.. they look much better than the 3-blade prop I had to use on mine. Do the landing gear retract? I can't really tell from the pictures, but it (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinion on the Sopwith Camel?
|
|
(...) It sure does--thanks to all. I just needed a graphic explanation of how the engine stroked. :) I've always passed Angelucci up, only because he goes for breadth over depth. But for comparative discussion that's more valuable, no doubt about (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinion on the Sopwith Camel?
|
|
(...) I have two great books I found at Borders Books a few weeks ago. They are the "Illustrated Encyclopedia of Military Aircraft" and "Illustrated Encyclopedia of Civil Aircraft" both by Enzo Angelucci. Between these two books they have most every (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinion on the Sopwith Camel?
|
|
(...) Try this link, (URL) . I did a search on Gnome rotary, as that was the most famous one I can think of. In short, the cylinders and crankcase rotate around the hollow, offcenter crankshaft. The intake valve is in the bottom of the piston, and (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Vought F-4 Corsair
|
|
My latest creation is a Vought F-4 Corsair. This is my first attempt at a real WW2 color scheme, and I'm quite pleased with the results. I used every single blue slope I own in the Corsair's long nose. Unfortunantly, I sacrificed a few details in (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinion on the Sopwith Camel?
|
|
(...) Try "radial engine" or "radial rotary engine" the more correct term for the engine type in your search. Best DaveG (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinion on the Sopwith Camel?
|
|
(...) I've been trying to find a diagram of the old rotary engine, but searches always bring up the Wankel engine, which isn't nearly the same thing. I'm trying to get a sense for how much of the engine rotated, and how fuel delivery was done if the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Fokker Dr. 1
|
|
That is amazing! Great job! I love it! It is so life like, so smooth, I love the cannons, the wings are perfect, this is sweet, I can just hear the sound of the engine in my ear, ;-) Great work! can't wait to see more! -Geordan- (...) (23 years ago, 17-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Take Two - Heinkel He219 WWII German Nightfighter
|
|
Wow! thatlooks so much better! very cool, Great job, -Geordan- (...) (23 years ago, 17-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Take Two - Heinkel He219 WWII German Nightfighter
|
|
(...) Good point; I think I could do this with the current structure by adding 45 slopes to the top of the wing, and shifting everything up by one brick. I could also lengthen them in the same way. I'll try it out. (...) You're right, the silhouette (...) (23 years ago, 16-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
