 | | Re: Definition of "micro"
|
| (...) Hello all, IMO, Microscale is really in a development stage, and although there are some key players that have done some outstanding work and have for years, most AFOL have yet to dabble in this scale. Micro is a delight because with in a (...) (22 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.build.microscale, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Definition of "micro"
|
| (...) I agree. Down with compartmentalized dorkism! There was similar sillines (IMO) in .space when people wanted to come up with standard rules for defining different types of spaceships, ignoring the fact that these MOCs by different builders were (...) (22 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.build.microscale, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Definition of "micro"
|
| (...) I was talking to Janey Cook about this very issue just recently; she had told me that some people wished to have some sort of established levels of scale. I told her this idea was silly. What I like most about micro-scale is how free-form it (...) (22 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.build.microscale, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Brickfest
|
| (...) That is a ring world created by Lenny Hoffman. Its a huge ring around a planet or star, that rotates, with gravity produced by centrifugal force (centripedal?) Its a common concept seen in Sci-fi novels, although Lenny's is ridicolously out of (...) (22 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.build.microscale)
| | | | | Brickfest
|
| Hi all, I've been poring over pictures by "scrope" in this folder: (URL) great stuff! I really need to build more at this scale. To me, the best of show is this train station: (URL) built that? Was it a COLTC group creation, or was it an individual? (...) (22 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.build.microscale)
|
|
