To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.mechaOpen lugnet.build.mecha in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Mecha / 13055
13054  |  13056
Subject: 
Re: T.A.U.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.mecha
Date: 
Sat, 23 Jul 2005 00:54:40 GMT
Viewed: 
1512 times
  
In lugnet.build.mecha, Peter F. Guenther wrote:
   In lugnet.build.mecha, Allister McLaren wrote:

   Very nifty. There’s lots to like about this, but the problem i have with it is that a tripedal mecha in this configuration would never be able to actually walk. In order to do that it needs to be able to lift at least one leg in the air, which it could never do. Add a leg, and you’ll have something both neat and logical.

By that logic, humans would not be able to walk either. A tripedal unit could throw itself off balance, lift a leg, and catch itself in a more forward position--or balance itself on two legs before lifting a leg.

I’m not claiming it’s efficient but it’s certainly possible

Nifty design. I like the overall design and the color scheme--but a different background color might have made the photos a bit better.

Peter

Thanks, Peter,

I’m still working on my photography. :)

I agree with you , that movement for the T.A.U. would be far from efficient (that’s why it’s a LONG range fire support mech...LOL)!

Thanks for your comments!

-Jon



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: T.A.U.
 
(...) By that logic, humans would not be able to walk either. A tripedal unit could throw itself off balance, lift a leg, and catch itself in a more forward position--or balance itself on two legs before lifting a leg. I'm not claiming it's (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)

11 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR