 | | Re: Still missing ballots from 5 people
|
|
(...) I sent an email to Todd but on reflection I think that the questions I asked ought to be publicly asked. 1. My MO as "auditor" was going to be to stash the ballots in a safe place and not do anything more unless and until someone raises a (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Still missing ballots from 5 people
|
|
(...) I don't think this was covered in the rules either. I say that if there are disqualifications, we simply sack those entries and call winners from the remaining pool. It's taken what-- 3 weeks from the end of the contest already. I'm not (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Still missing ballots from 5 people
|
|
(...) I'm not a voter so I dunno if I should even be taking a position (election officials are supposed to be impartial, right) but unfortunately... I already did take a position, which is to agree with you. (...) Well (1), remember, we're dealing (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Still missing ballots from 5 people
|
|
Hahaha LOL... This thread is reminding me of certain other votes recently... I can see it now... "I want a recount!" "No! You can't change the rules after the election..." "But -every- vote must be counted; the will of the people must prevail!" (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Still missing ballots from 5 people
|
|
(...) No, the title would just go to the one with the next-highest number of vote- points in that category. (...) Ya, too messy. (...) That's what I had in mind, yes. (...) It's not spelled out, unfortunately. --Todd (24 years ago, 27-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.space)
|
