Subject:
|
Re: Casting Satan and Jesus for The Brick Testament
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.ancient
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Apr 2004 03:01:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2680 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build.ancient, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
> I'm happy with the choice of Satan, altho I prefer a larger, more beastial
> depiction.
Speaking of that, my first thought was to cast Derek Schin's mom, but Keith
Goldman wouldn't give her up for even one weekend, so I had to come up with a
new approach.
> Perhaps I can suggest using different versions of Satan to depict the
> different ways that Satan acts. My reading of the Bible has suggested that
> perhaps Satan isn't one clearly defined individual the way Jesus et al are.
>
> IE, if Satan is depicted in Hell - he could have the Quirrel face to show the
> mark of being cast out by god or acting in a more base (rather than clever)
> form of evil. etc
As I mentioned in my response to Bruce, I'm not sure just how many more
opportunities I'll get to include Satan in future Brick Testament stories -- he
just doesn't get much play in the Bible. And there's not really any indication
from the Bible that Satan resides in or regularly makes appearances in Hell.
The only tenuous connection is in Revelation where Satan is cast down into the
"abyss" for 1,000 years. But presumably this is a future event being described.
> BTW, love reading the latest updates - particularly funny and thoughtful.
Thanks!
-Brendan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Casting Satan and Jesus for The Brick Testament
|
| (...) I'm happy with the choice of Satan, altho I prefer a larger, more beastial depiction. Perhaps I can suggest using different versions of Satan to depict the different ways that Satan acts. My reading of the Bible has suggested that perhaps (...) (21 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.build.ancient, FTX)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
