 | | Re: New MOCs: Minifig scale cars and trucks —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | (...) I think that building under constraints is what makes it interesting. At four wide, the constraints are pretty severe, hence the challenge is even greater! This is why I am somewhat tempted to build trains. There are a series of constraints (...) (23 years ago, 2-Aug-01, to lugnet.build)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New MOCs: Minifig scale cars and trucks —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Except John Neal, who builds at whatever scale he likes... 2 wide, 4 wide, 6 wide, 8 wide, 14 wide... now I hear he's thinking about 50(!!!) wide. :-) (23 years ago, 2-Aug-01, to lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New MOCs: Minifig scale cars and trucks —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | | (...) I wasn't thinking about the scale constraints. I was thinking about the practical constraints. For example, if you actually want the train to be useful in a layout, it must be able to negotiate the tight curves. It must also have some kind of (...) (23 years ago, 2-Aug-01, to lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New MOCs: Minifig scale cars and trucks —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | (...) If I were to get into trains, I would probably follow John Neal's example and ignore all the constraints... (...) Thanks! (...) They haven't come after me yet! I just realized that I don't think I have any disclaimers on my pages either! :) (...) (23 years ago, 2-Aug-01, to lugnet.build)
|
| | | | |
