Subject:
|
Re: New MOCs: Minifig scale cars and trucks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 15:10:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
343 times
|
| |
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> writes:
> This is why I am somewhat tempted to build trains. There are a series
> of constraints that everybody share and must face. Hence, it makes
> more sense to compare MOCs. But on the other hand, if I get bitten by
> the trains bug, it will severly impact my wallet and my spare time and
> my apartement space... (And my sanity?);-)
If I were to get into trains, I would probably follow John Neal's example
and ignore all the constraints...
> > Old MOCs (that you may never have seen!):
> Oh, I've seen them before, and they are very interesting! I like the
> front windshield on the Land Rover and Crazy Car.
Thanks!
> > Main site: http://lego.bldesign.org
> Just out of plain interest: Is it "legal" to use an URL like that? Or
> was it only the use of "lego" in the second level domain name that was
> legally wrong? I don't mean to accuse you of doing nasty things, I'm
> just genuinly interested!
They haven't come after me yet! I just realized that I don't think I have
any disclaimers on my pages either! :)
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht
bram@cwru.edu
http://bldesign.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New MOCs: Minifig scale cars and trucks
|
| (...) I think that building under constraints is what makes it interesting. At four wide, the constraints are pretty severe, hence the challenge is even greater! This is why I am somewhat tempted to build trains. There are a series of constraints (...) (23 years ago, 2-Aug-01, to lugnet.build)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
