Subject:
|
Re: Yet another Escher - "Waterfall"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Sat, 3 May 2003 21:14:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
683 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build, Andrew Lipson writes:
> I have to admit I've never really got into the mosaic thing - it seems just
> a bit mechanical.
While the tesselations look pretty cool on paper, it seems a bit too
easy to transfer a flat image to a flat construction. The biggest challenge
with the Escher collection is turning the physically impossible designs into
physical creations. Granted, they're only mostly 2D, and mostly 2D isn't
all 2D, but I don't think anyone's going to go through Escher's pockets
looking for loose change...um, I mean, the 2D parts wouldn't be nearly as
exciting to see reproduced in LEGO than the 3D parts.
> We do have a half-baked idea for a _partly_ mosaic Escher picture, though >probably not the one you first think of.
Horsemen? It's a tesselation printed on a moebius strip, which could
be extremely interesting to see in 3D, and it would require some serious
trickery to reproduce in LEGO.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Yet another Escher - "Waterfall"
|
| (...) I agree that Metamorphose would look spectacular, but I doubt I have anything like enough monochrome plates to build it at a scale that would do it justice :-( And there's quite a lot of hexagonal symmetry in this (and many other Escher (...) (22 years ago, 3-May-03, to lugnet.build)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
