To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.buildOpen lugnet.build in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / *30680 (-20)
  Re: An Eviller N33dle
 
(...) 3vilicious! (URL) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Re: New guy + First Mech
 
Wow! First mecha? It looks like you've been doing this for awhile now. Welcome to .space with joint tech. :) I don't really have any criticisms with this model save the colorscheme, but you've already explained why that is, so I'll let it drop. I (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.build.mecha)
 
  Re: My first mech!
 
Welcome Matthew! We love having first timers posting around here. It helps keep the ideas fresh and it shows that there are more than five creative minds at work. ;) Keep up the great work, we're expecting a followup now.... -Dave (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.build.mecha)
 
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
(...) Indeed it does, but the proportions always remain the same. >> Mark (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
Just for the record, notched axles work just fine... as long as you use enough of them. Quick experimentation showed me that using 6 or more produces a combined friction that holds the structure together quite tightly, even with the notched axles. (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.build)
 
  Re: An Eviller N33dle
 
Hey Cranium.. need help figuring out where you can stick that? CAPTAIN FAZOOM! (URL) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  An Eviller N33dle
 
W33ny forces of what is called good, take your medicine! (2 URLs) Folder> (URL) Dr. Cranium "Evil just got way more n33dler..." (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
(...) Congratulations, you win...um, you win...well, you don't win anything, actually, but that pretty efficiently takes care of most of this discussion (though it would probably look better in 2x8 bricks). I'd thought about using pins to do the (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
(...) I actually don't know. Does it? I've never read the books (I found that quote while looking for any page that actually listed true dimensions), and I don't believe I ever watched 2001. I remember watching 2010 when I was still pretty (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
[adding .geek] (...) It's been a while since I read these books, but doesn't their physical *size change*? (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
(...) (URL) Cheers, Matt "Make it so" (21 years ago, 25-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  My first mech!
 
Hello All - I'm a first time poster in .mecha :) I was reading about all of the fantastic creations that are popping up around here lately, and I thought, why not make my own? So I did. Meet Frogbot! (URL) Gallery (post moderation): (URL) Sorry (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
 
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
<snip> (...) I am of the belief that you guys are nuts! :) (No offence intended) the simplest solution, as far as I can work out, is to build it for the most part studs up, and use some 2 stud long technic axles inside the inner tubes of the brick, (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
(...) ...which is the minimum size required to achieve the 1x4x9 dimensional ratio. I have been unable to find any evidence that the actual physical dimensions are known, beyond one person's claim that the physical Cinerama screen (which has an (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.build)
 
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
(...) Well yeah... but it would be interesting to build one of the correct _physical_ proportions, if only to say that you did it. (As has been established, this works out to 2 studs wide, 8 studs across, and 15 brick-heights high.) (...) Yes... (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.build)
 
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
(...) 1 4 9 ?? where have I heard that before?... I had no idea it was 1 4 9 ! OK, seriously. What I'm driving at is that if you want to do it in bricks and do it the easy way, studs up, the dimensions I gave for bricks of 2x8x15 high convert to 40 (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.build)
 
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
<snip> (...) Dunno about checking--my brain is a little fried today (long week of checking numbers and cross references here). If I recall correctly from reading the book, the 1 x 4 x 9 dimension comes from the squares of "the first three numbers": (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.build)
 
  Re: 3 ideas I had
 
(...) Actually I think this idea was used in 5850 The Royal Crystal Palace. Well, ok, I think it uses cones. Frank (21 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle)
 
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
(...) You'd never know that I minored in Math.... There's a common divisor there I didn't notice. Make that 2x8x15. >> Mark (21 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.build)
 
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
(...) Ed Toton made a lunar Monolith scene, but the dimensions weren't listed (it's way too small to be 2x8x15, though): (URL) Thomas did make a LEGO-based movie version of 2001, and according to the responses, it did include a Monolith that (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.build)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR