 | | Re: Scans of my Minifigs
|
|
(...) Gem Break-downs: 5823 (3 Total): 1 Trans-pink 1 Clear 1 Trans-Blue 5824 (9 Total): 2 Trans-pink 1 Trans-yellow 1 Clear 5 Trans-Blue (...) Me too. I need more Mailboxes! I may have to order some... (...) I don't think it is all that yucky, as (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of my Minifigs
|
|
(...) Yeah, for gems, 5823 and 5824 are great! I practically doubled my gem collection by getting two of each. I can't wait for 5826, though, 'cause I think it may come with a trans-orange gem. :) Also, I hope next year they have a Dragon slaying (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of my Minifigs
|
|
(...) Yeah, I wasn't looking at the picture while writing, and I recalled *some* pink elements in that geographical area :-) (...) Are you saying that 6420s are *still* available?! I'm ordering some tomorrow! Thanks for the info, I was sure they (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of my Minifigs
|
|
(...) #5824 (Millimy's Bedroom) does indeed come with a peasant's bag, but it's in blue, not pink. This is actually one of the main reasons to get this set, if you ask me. That is one fantastic element! It looks just awesome on a traveling princess! (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of my Minifigs
|
|
(...) number of (...) If you mean the "diamond" well, it appears in recent Belville sets 5824 and (not confirmed, but pretty sure) 5923 too. These are actually (IMO) really good value sets: 5824 gives you 7 gems in 4 different colors, a rabbit, a (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of my Minifigs
|
|
(...) Actually adventurers IIRC only have red gems, while Belville offers a variety of gem colors. (blue, dk. pink, clear, green and more). Also the green one appears in the new castle biggie (6091) and also other random sets have random gem colors (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: Quick review of the Belville Yacht
|
|
(...) Don't get me wrong, I think so too! I just didn't find this the *best* thing in the set, is all. (...) Yeah, those are good too. On reflection, I can use them for my (planned) Castle's throne room... Hmmm... (...) Well, this is the first BV (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has gotten on its feet!
|
|
(...) of (...) like the (...) scale (...) Forgive the ignorance (I'm a trainie fan, not a trainie expert), but what is G scale? (...) Ooooh! At the age of 11, I wasn't that much into completing themes and I only have one BV set as of now (The BV (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on its feet!
|
|
(...) The truth? I actually liked it to begin with (hey, I was 11 when I saw the first catalog with Belville - cut me some slack here ;-), then I decided it was stupid, but lately I just couldn't ignore the fact that it is a great theme. (...) I (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on its feet!
|
|
(...) Not to be one either.. but just in general do you have anything against belville? If so, PLEASE come out and say it, 'cause (as Suzanne mentioned) it's (1) very interesting. If not, why can't we continue our discussion in .general? (...) (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
Not to be a pain in the butt here.. though could someone please take the general followup off here ???? Thanks Tamy (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
(...) I could probably spare a couple figs (I have several copies of 5846, almost 2 sets of 5890 figs, plus perhaps a few extras). (...) You don't want to know how many of those I have... Actually, I do have a plan to use some of the pink ones as a (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
(...) Long before the Ninja castle line was introduced, I thought that the Belville figures would make good Ninja figures, due to their posability. You could actually make them grip a katana with both hands. -- jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Quick review of the Belville Yacht
|
|
(...) I think the fact that it's a Belville set with *function* is very cool. Most Belville sets are very simple backdrops for pretend-play. The closest we get to Belville which does something is a swing or a slide. So having a floating boat is very (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
(...) Yeah, they were sort of girlie-girl. (...) That doesn't make them *look* better. Those faces are just weird. I think they're getting better, but they have a blank, staring quality. Oh, well. They're head-and-shoulders above Playmobil. In both (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has gotten on its feet!
|
|
John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message news:3883D7B5.13F60B...est.net... (...) Belville (...) BV (...) respect to (...) What better is inserting a Belville adult female head on top of a technic guy body. Looks very nice. I have "Princess" (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has gotten on its feet!
|
|
I'll admit I am a Belville and Scala fan, although I *do* have the safety net of saying that I'm buying them for my 12 yo daughter...;-) But seriously, I like the BV figs for this reason-- the BV youth are just about the correct size for G scale (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
Suzanne D. Rich wrote in message ... (...) set.. (...) their (...) in (...) which (...) with (...) too (...) to (...) some (...) also (...) He he he... Yea, I've played around a bit with swapping body parts. (...) call (...) Yea, that is a dramatic (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
(...) [...] Woo! I was waiting for a post like this. I noticed the activity level too. Speaking to those who don't like BV, I'll admit -- when I first saw a BV set.. long ago.. I gaged. But after years studying a wide variety of toys for their (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
|
(...) I see what you mean. I hate the prices too, and the scale IS tough to deal with. (...) Yup. And sorrowfully enough, I would do the same thing, and probably so would everybody else. (...) Do you mean the Good Fairy Queen? Or the evil (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
