|
|
 | | Re: Whatup .basic
|
| (...) If you are to be so hard on the definitions I don't think BASIC should have a theme at all! :) (...) Same goes with me, both facts! Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
| | | | | Re: Whatup .basic
|
| "Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:HA6tsG.LsA@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) I did consider that one, but decided it isn't really my idea of "Basic". Personally, I think the true "basic" feel doesn't even have minifigs, (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
| | | | | Re: Whatup .basic
|
| "Jon Palmer" <jon@zemi.net> wrote in message news:HA61D4.BMv@lugnet.com... (...) have (...) something (...) Hmm ... one of my Basic favorites is 725 - (URL) This set has a great selection of parts. I have managed to pick up two of them over the (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
| | | | | Re: Whatup .basic
|
| (...) I suppose you don't consider <set:375> (or <set:6075> ) as BASIC? Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
| | | | | Re: Whatup .basic
|
| "Hendo (John P. Henderson)" <hendo@valyance.com> wrote in message news:HA6347.Hzn@lugnet.com... (...) :) Doh. Forgot about that one. Now that is a good word too. Makes me think of useful parts and cool box art. (...) would (...) collection but I (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
|
|
