Subject:
|
Re: New LEGO Toys Based on Jurassic Park III
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.animation
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Jul 2001 04:51:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5723 times
|
| |
|
|
Yeah, TLG has been losing it's "original" products (Space Police VS
Blacktron, DECENT Town sets, etc. etc.). When I was in second grade (about 6
years ago) my friends and I found an old Lego magazine from like '91 and we
say the Blacktron sets and went... w..ww...ow. wowwowwwooww...
an we called the S@H people and they said they didn't make them anymore and
we were like "Uh! Ohh..." It really stunk to us. Now I think little kids may
see the Spyruis magazines and such and be like "ww..www.w.w.wwwwwww...ow.."
like we were. Sorta dissapoints me.
Although we liked the themes a lot, we probally would have tended to enjoy
Star Wars a lot more than Blacktron, or we would have mixed them together.
That would create an intersting phenomonon :-D...
--
Chef/Dan/Bubba Bear
ICQ:84584424
AIM: DaGlassAWasta
http://lostislandofmonkeys.cjb.net
PS> I suppose I'm a little late posting this, the thread's from Februrary
:-)
Lorbaat <eric@nospam.thirteen.net> wrote in message
news:G8AsE3.7JL@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.publish.cinema, Eric Kingsley writes:
>
> > Unfortuately Your right... I'm just getting worried that this whole • licensing
> > thing might be going a bit too far. I think Star Wars and Disney were
> > interesting,
>
> Star Wars I was definitely all over. I mean, SW is a quality license, and • I'm
> a huge fan, so of course I was ecstatic.
>
> Disney, same thing. I mean, the established Mickeyverse characters. • Well, I'm
> not a huge fan... but I mean it's been around for years and years and • years,
> the recognition is there (maybe even more than Star Wars) and it was a • good
> move.
>
> > Harry Potter was probably a good fit,
>
> Since I like HP too, I was happy to hear this. Although I have to admit • that I
> wondered if it wasn't an indicator that they were going to be taking on • more
> and more licenses with less-established products...
>
> > Jack who?,
>
> Is Jack Stone a license? I didn't think it was, I thought it was just an
> action-oriented Creator line.
>
> > Jurassic Park...
> > why? isn't that kind of like what the whole current Adventurers theme is • based
> > on anyway?
>
> Well, to be fair these are apparently going to be "Moviemaker" sets. • Although
> the same question can be asked... aren't these what it's kind of based on
> anyway?
>
> I wonder if they'll use the new "Dinosaurs" peices in the JP Moviemaker • sets.
>
> Anyway, with all the dino-stuff in the first run of Moviemaker, and • Speilberg's
> involvement in JP3, I kinda thought we'd ear about this eventually.
>
> It's a shame, since The Lost World was such a terrible movie.
>
> > Oh well if it keeps the $$ flowing for TLC then all the more power to • them.
>
> Well. I feel the same way, sort of. If TLC thinks that this is the way • to
> make money, they might abandon the things that make me like them so much • in the
> first place.
>
> eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New LEGO Toys Based on Jurassic Park III
|
| (...) Star Wars I was definitely all over. I mean, SW is a quality license, and I'm a huge fan, so of course I was ecstatic. Disney, same thing. I mean, the established Mickeyverse characters. Well, I'm not a huge fan... but I mean it's been around (...) (26 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.animation)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
