 | | Re: The Official "Issues List" —Richie Dulin
|
| | | (...) Well, community members have been repeatedly raising all the other issues on the list... So, should we ignore them and put saving 9V trains to number 1 regardless of what community members are actually bringing to our attention and asking us (...) (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Official "Issues List" —William R. Ward
|
| | | | (...) I just took a look at the current list (from (URL) right?) and I think there is a good reason to place 9V ahead of all of those issues: If none of those issues are addressed by LEGO, there is no change. If the 9V trains issue is not addressed, (...) (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Official "Issues List" —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | | (...) Well, the end of 9V trains would mean no change to my involvement in the hobby: no change to my purchasing patterns, no change to the amount of stuff I build, and so on. By contrast, for example, if a portion of the product range is not (...) (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX) !
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Official "Issues List" —Scott Wardlaw
|
| | | | | | | Nelson / Richie, Thanks again for posting this list, and for your diligent work as LEGO Ambassadors. (I hope that you get paid for it) I think I also need to say that I am appalled by 9V Trains not being on the original list. Are you guys (...) (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The Official "Issues List" —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I think I am missing something here... this "becoming known as the largest mistake TLG has made"? I think you mean not saving 9V trains - but it isn't actually made yet. And people would argue that the colour change was, or the introduction of (...) (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Official "Issues List" —Scott Lyttle
|
| | | | | | (...) Richie, I don't like to attack people, but I find your view of the 9V train issue not very becoming of a LEGO Ambassador. Because you do not purchase 9V trains does not mean that everyone else does not purchase 9V trains. I'm sure there are (...) (17 years ago, 2-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Official "Issues List" —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | | | (...) What is it about my view that you don't find very becoming? What is it that you think my view of 9V trains is? (...) Exactly!!! That's why I said "But that’s just me as an individual. I can look at the bigger picture, and appreciate that the (...) (17 years ago, 2-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Official "Issues List" —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | (...) Well, the end of 9V trains would mean no change to my involvement in the hobby: no change to my purchasing patterns, no change to the amount of stuff I build, and so on. By contrast, for example, if a portion of the product range is not (...) (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX) !!
|
| | | | |
