 | | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) I just took a look at the current list (from (URL) right?) and I think there is a good reason to place 9V ahead of all of those issues: If none of those issues are addressed by LEGO, there is no change. If the 9V trains issue is not addressed, (...) (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) Somebody else explained it elsewhere in the thread - control. Some people within TLG are still gunshy about how and when and where information is released. And the time that I was able to announce something as an Ambassador, well, (URL) it (...) (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) What's the story with this? Sounds like they're passing up some very cheap, very targeted advertising opportunities there. Allister (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) Well, community members have been repeatedly raising all the other issues on the list... So, should we ignore them and put saving 9V trains to number 1 regardless of what community members are actually bringing to our attention and asking us (...) (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) I guess I just expected that the ambassadors would make it their job to know what the top issues are for the LEGO community without us having to nag them. (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
