 | | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets —Joseph Gonzalez
|
| | | (...) --snip-- (...) That's a good point. I don't have both models in front of me right now but I remember that I didn't like the bulky wheels of the BB. My original adequate.com review of the BB also mentioned something about the tail dragging on (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | If you really want to learn the comments of an aeronautical engineer (1), Both of them sucks separately. BB is much more realistic in terms of "real planes", though it really sucks with its lack of a lever, sloppy propeller connection and (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets —Jeff Johnston
|
| | | | (...) People keep saying this, along witht he comments about standing up to fire the rifles and such. Am I the only one that used a little imagination here and decided that the 'rifles' on the BB were an attempt at representing Gatling guns or other (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) For the most part, I have to agree with you. Whether or not it's accurate doesn't really matter that much to me on a scale like this. They get the point across that the thing is a WWI style plane with guns. Maybe if you're an avionics expert (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets —Roger D. Parks
|
| | | | In lugnet.adventurers, David Eaton writes: {SNIP} (...) much (...) Being married to a WW-I aviation fan has its odd uses <grin>. The weapons were mounted above the wing in single-seat scouts (what we would call fighters) until Fokker invented the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |
