 | | Re: New Set Availability at US S@H
|
|
(...) Ooh, I'd love to hear it:-) Since I haven't gotten the actual dinos for closer examination yet, I'll hold my nits to two. First, kudos to TLC for placing the shoulder girdle *under* the ribcages of the tricerablocks and the stlegosaurs. With (...) (24 years ago, 23-Apr-00, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: New Set Availability at US S@H
|
|
(...) Yes--the design of the actual models is pretty good (although I do have issues with the stegosaur's plates being *raised*--they probably laid pretty flat, if John McLoughlin is correct--and the Triceratops frill not being attached to the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Apr-00, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: New Set Availability at US S@H
|
|
Lindsay, what's your academic specialty? -- Paul Davidson, aka Tinman www.theforce.net | Your Daily Dose of Star Wars www.filmforce.net | Your Daily Dose of Film News Mr L F Braun <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote in message (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: New Set Availability at US S@H
|
|
(...) Raised plates are the most widely accepted theory, which is probably why they went that route. What are John Mcloughlin's reason for believing they laid flat? Jeff (24 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: New Set Availability at US S@H
|
|
(...) It's a looooong story. By various measures, at various times, it's been palaeontology (vertebrate evolution), astronomy and stellar evolution, biochemistry, and (most importantly, because it's what I study now) history. I can usually find an (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: New Set Availability at US S@H
|
|
Cool. :) That explains your paleontology knowledge (and your dual fixation with sea and space-faring ships). -- Paul Davidson Mr L F Braun <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote in message news:39063448.CD95F2...msu.edu... (...) history. I (...) a (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: New Set Availability at US S@H
|
|
(...) And now we know who to put on our phone a friend list if any of us ever goes on Who Wants to be a Millionaire! : ) Maggie C. (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: New Set Availability at US S@H
|
|
(...) on (...) Ack, no. With my luck I'd get the question asking me to name the three lead Munchkins from "The Wizard of Oz," which I don't have the first clue about. Either that or something equally bizarre, like the make and model of that clock (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: New Set Availability at US S@H
|
|
(...) Only if the contestant put you down for that category. You can have a couple different friends listed, and who is called depends on what categories of knowledge you associated them with. :) Jeff (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: New Set Availability at US S@H
|
|
(...) If memory serves, those were The Mayor, The Barrister, and The Coroner. Dave! (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: New Set Availability at US S@H
|
|
(...) No. (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: New Set Availability at US S@H
|
|
(...) Okay, Dave will have to go on the list for those obscure L. Frank Baum questions! Maggie (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: New Set Availability at US S@H
|
|
(...) fixation (...) goes (...) questions! Heh! Not really! Ages ago, during my senior year in high school, through an inspired bit of casting, I was shoved into the part of the Munchkin Mayor. Tallest guy in the play (just 6’1"--not especially (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
