  |    | Re: Dinosaurs!
  |  
  | 
(...) ...behold in awe the fierce battle between Tyrannosaurus Brix and Legosaurus!    (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.off-topic.pun)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: 2000 Scans are Online!
  |  
  | 
(...) I'd say definitely Adventurers for the plane. It's got a couple of pterodactyls flying around it. Pterodactyls! How cool. -Pete    (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: 2000 Scans are Online!
  |  
  | 
 (...) Yup! (...) Nah, assuming all the Artic sets are listed in the Artic page (page 23, c00am-23), that leaves Adventurers, which the new ones arn't listed. Also, it's along with the other Adcenturers stuff, not the Artic in the mural. And in that (...)   (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Dinosaurs!
  |  
  | 
Also check out the new plane and pterodactyls in red and tan that are on page 10. (...)    (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: 2000 Scans are Online!
  |  
  | 
(...) You mean the one at (URL)? Finally, the pantoon plane is done correctly! However, it might as well be from the Artic theme. I don't know. Doesn't it look a bit too modern to be an Adventurers flyingboat? Either way, it is a cool plane. Overall (...)   (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Dinosaurs!
  |  
  | 
(...) jur-abs-ic park!? later ~ craig    (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Dinosaurs!
  |  
  | 
(...) And of course the new dinosaurs can be mixed up with Wild West for that "Valley of Gwangi" feeling. Hooray! -Pete    (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Dinosaurs!
  |  
  | 
 Proceed immediately to: (URL) behold. So we go from mummies and spiders into "The Lost World". Let me be the first to say (and I'm sure many agree) that this is a pretty darn swell thing, a great direction for this theme to go. I can't wait for (...)   (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Movie list
  |  
  | 
In lugnet.adventurers, Mark Lindsey writes: <schnip!> (...) LEGO can't get me a girlfriend?!? <throws bricks down in disgust> MAN! I wasted all my time on this for NOTHING! *grin* That was good; now I've scared the cats. **sigh** -The Cheese, who is (...)   (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Adventurers and dinosaurs in 2000
  |  
  | 
(...) Hi Paul Yeah last week I posted to duplo and general a fantasy of mine that they would produce a full dino set and got carried away with the brilliance of this! Once i started thinking about how great it would be I wondered why they had never (...)   (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Adventurers and dinosaurs in 2000
  |  
  | 
I'm surprised more people haven't been talking about this here. :) I remember reading some of the earlier speculations, and I believe person suggested a dinosaur adventurer subtheme. Congratulations to whomever it was. I wonder how they'll work it (...)   (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Adventurers and dinosaurs in 2000
  |  
  | 
(...) these would probably be duplo-saurs, rather than system dinos; giving a whole new meaning to the term,"terrible lizard". later ~ craig    (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Adventurers and dinosaurs in 2000
  |  
  | 
I figured the first catalog would show up in a Star Wars set. It would probably be a 1999 set that has been in production the whole year, therefore they would be making a new run of them in time for the Solstice. KL (...) some (...)    (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Adventurers and dinosaurs in 2000
  |  
  | 
Others probably already heard but here's a snippet from a post to rtl: Thad A. Doria <tad@journals.uchicago.edu> wrote in message news:3826E8E0.4A7B@j...ago.edu... (...) This is from a thread about a guy wanting pics of 2000 castle and arctic (in (...)   (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Movie list
  |  
  | 
(...) I do agree Christian. The wording should have been more specific and I'll have to work on that next time. (...) Once more for the record. The post where I said let's try to "beat" the other groups was very tongue-in-cheek. I thought that would (...)   (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Movie list
  |  
  | 
(...) Thanks Craig! After last week I'll take all the support I can get. Talk about a shark tank. I was wondering where you guys had gone. Cheers, Mark L P.S. Your site is awesome! Keep putting up everything. I WANT TO SEE MORE! P.S.S. Did you ever (...)   (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Movie list
  |  
  | 
(...) I'd say it flared up like a super nova for about one day. Then Todd posted up saying that it was a reasonable topic as long as it was not in the general area. As soon as the naysayers read that I am sure their ire dried up. (...) Well it all (...)   (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
  |  
  | 
(...) I would direct you to this post by Todd. (URL) for your opinions, they are your opinions and mine are mine. I am just glad we both have a forum to say just that. Cheers, Mark L    (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Adventurers in 2000?
  |  
  | 
(...) Yes... Arctic would be nice. Or how about some combo of Adventurers/Spaceport? Maybe the Spanish Missions? Or the ummm... Sewer dump explorers? Well Hey! It's a new category for lugnet.underground... heheh. AlEx RoOdE Take the Star Wars quiz: (...)   (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Adventurers in 2000?
  |  
  | 
(...) I (...) sure (...) Nah, I just felt I had dissapointed some *very* excited people and thought I should repeat why I posted what I posted. :-) Julie    (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   |