 | | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets
|
|
(...) They mostly had at least a skid under the tail. I can't think of a plane that actually dragged the back end of the fusalage and the trailing edge of the tailplane along the ground like the BB does. Those WWI and earlier planes were so lightly (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets
|
|
(...) Some of the WW1 planes are "tail-draggers" On my LEGO models I add the LEGO piece thats looks like a 1x2 plate with two rods attached to either end. Lots easier on the tail : ) (...) you dont see the strings tied to the triggers? <grin> (...) (...) (26 years ago, 26-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets
|
|
In lugnet.adventurers, David Eaton writes: {SNIP} (...) much (...) Being married to a WW-I aviation fan has its odd uses <grin>. The weapons were mounted above the wing in single-seat scouts (what we would call fighters) until Fokker invented the (...) (26 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets
|
|
(...) For the most part, I have to agree with you. Whether or not it's accurate doesn't really matter that much to me on a scale like this. They get the point across that the thing is a WWI style plane with guns. Maybe if you're an avionics expert (...) (26 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets
|
|
(...) People keep saying this, along witht he comments about standing up to fire the rifles and such. Am I the only one that used a little imagination here and decided that the 'rifles' on the BB were an attempt at representing Gatling guns or other (...) (26 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
