 | | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET —Jake McKee
| | | | (...) Honestly, I'm a bit surprised that no one has commented more on this particular update. This seems overly restrictive and I'm not exactly sure how I feel about LUGNET terms now being based on German law. Am I the only one that sees a serious (...) (18 years ago, 19-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET —Steve Bliss
| | | | | | snipped a lot of stuff (...) You are not the only one with definite concerns about this change. I can understand that Rene must operate with the law. But LUGNET's (prior) strong stand against censorship is a big deal to me. So this change, along (...) (18 years ago, 19-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET — Rene Hoffmeister
| | | | | | | (...) Hi Steve, things are never as bad as they seem. Though I reserve the right to cancel s.th., it doesn't mean that I make use of it, nowhere near. And for another thing: Nothing has really changed regarding this matter, it's more clear only. The (...) (18 years ago, 19-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET —Didier Enjary
| | | | | | (...) ... (...) I'm not surprised. Administrative stuffs are not of such a high importance for most of the LEGO builders, collectors, etc. (...) Theory and practice. There is more than a gap between them. I'm quite confident in the fact that this (...) (18 years ago, 19-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET —Bruce Hietbrink
| | | | | (...) Hey, I guess I'm okay with Rene's description, but as Didier said, this will come down to theory vs practice. I'm sure there would be no problem with something (URL) a battle scene>. Almost everthing I could imagine would fall into this realm. (...) (18 years ago, 19-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET — Rene Hoffmeister
| | | | | (...) You're right, that's not an issue, NFW. (...) I guess I know it, one could consider it as "bad taste", but as far as I remember, it was made too simple to be seriously glorifying violence. (...) It launched a discussion, but definitive is (...) (18 years ago, 19-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
| | | | | | |
