 | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | (...) I think there is, and I chose that word/phrase because I thought it would indicate that it is a potentially charged issue. People are forbidden to post auctions to any group but .market.auction. People can post "I'm selling this ..." messages (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms) !
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard? —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) For the record, I agree with Mike on this one. (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I suppose it depends on what standard one sees as being doubled. Normally the term applies to cases where there shouldn't be a double standard, like sexes or races. In this case, if the standard is "selling" or "flogging," then, yes, it's a (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) of (...) original (...) to (...) Perhaps something on the lines of: ---...--- Posts offering items for sale, trade, auction, or "wanted" posts, or anything else related to "market" type activities are (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms) !
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard? —Kevin Salm
|
| | | | (...) {some snippage} (...) Todd, I cannot agree with you here. Auctions have competition when multiple bidders are present--this may not happen in all auction cases. And when some bidders have more money, desire, etc to buy with than others--well (...) (25 years ago, 15-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
