 | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —Marc Nelson, Jr.
|
| | | Admins - Thanks for posting this outside of .admin so that everyone sees it. The Terms of Use need to be updated to reflect this new policy as well as some other changes. For example, both your post and my reply are against the TOU: 8. (do not) Post (...) (19 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Agreed. There are a number of relatively small things that need clarification, revision, expansion or elaboration. But I think these are all at the margins, the main thrust is clear. (...) I scratched my head about this for a bit, as I wasn't (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —Marc Nelson, Jr.
|
| | | | | | (...) snip (...) I was referring to the fact that FTX and images within posts are prohibited by the (URL) TOU>. A reasonable person who has been posting to LUGNET for years might know that the TOU is badly out of date and no longer reflects reality. (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Possibly prohibited. I don't see it that way, even without clarification (...) I saw the cite the last time, thanks. I do appreciate the re-citation just in case I didn't see it (although I responded directly to it), but I think the quote of (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —Marc Nelson, Jr.
|
| | | | | | (...) What part of the TOU is ambiguous? It says "It is a condition of your use of the discussion groups that you do not: (X)" - meaning that if you do X then you may not be allowed to use the discussion groups. Are there any other parts of the TOU (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | (...) The part that questions whether FTX is allowed specifically. Images, as they appear in FTX are definitely ALLOWED by that rule, because you are not posting a binary image, as the TOU specifically indicates not to do, you are posting a URL to (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.admin.terms, Marc Nelson, Jr. wrote: <snip> (...) In situations such as these, I often consult 'the oracle'... Judge Payton: "Judges are bound to interpret the Constitution within the strict parameters of the text itself. The Constitution (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | (canceled) — Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update — Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | | | Repost with updated formatting to avoid FTX display bug, ironically enough... (...) Hello Marc, The perceived absence of clear guidelines, and lack of consequences for poor behavior, have already had a chilling effect on LUGNET discussion. That's (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —Leonard Hoffman
|
| | | | (...) Hey Marc, I see that you have been reading my posts. Any particular reason why you refuse to acknowledge the facts and you refuse to stop insulting both myself, and the admins of CSF and CC? And to put those quotes in context: "I respond to (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | |
