Subject:
|
Re: Sale at The Vault this week!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 06:53:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6849 times
|
| |
|
|
And yet a further question - I used to post all my Brickbay info in b-s-t. I
hadn't posted for months, added some sets, some discounts, some parts, so I posted
in b-s-t.
I got a private email telling me I shouldn't do that, to post to .brickshops.
To me, .brickshops is more about discussing the running of brickshops, not
advertising what you have for sale. To ME, that kind of post belongs in b-s-t.
I'll post in .brickshops for now, but I sure would like to know if it's OK to post
in b-s-t or .shopping for Bricklink shops, as I read those far more than I read
.brickshops, and I'm sure other people do the same.
Kevin Salm wrote:
> XFUT: lugnet.admin.terms
>
> In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Jon Palmer writes:
> > Hey Matthew. It'd be great if you could keep posts of this nature in
> > .market.buy.sell-trade in the future.
> > .market.shopping is for shopping reports and so on.
> >
> > Thanks, and good luck on your sales.
> >
> > -Jon
>
> Hi Jon. According to the charter for .market.shopping [1] these types of
> announcemnts are allowed and should not be problematic. Here is exactly how
> the charter for .shopping reads:
>
> ++CHARTER/PURPOSE:
> ++lugnet.market.shopping (group):
> Retail, mail-order, and online shopping: information, discussions,
> experiences, analysis; FOTW's (Find of the Week), sales, promotions,
> coupon offers; LEGO Shop-At-Home Service (phone/flyer specials,
> availability, etc.); liquidation outlets, second-hand stores, garage
> sale tips, etc.
>
> A strict interpretation of this charter does not disallow this type of post.
> Matt's post is a sale announcement for online shopping which is clearly
> permitted via the charter.
>
> If the reason this type of post is considered offensive is because it is
> posted
> directly by the vendor, then the charter may need to be adjusted to reflect
> this. The charter does not now prohibit posts by vendors.
>
> IN FACT, one such vendor in particular has been instructed to post to
> .shopping
> only and not to b-s-t. That vendor is Emmanuel Fouquet of DYA-shopping.com
> One discussion on this is here -->
> http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=5389
> This would appear to validate the argument that messages posted directly by
> the
> vendors belong in .shopping. {I guess this means that if Target and WalMart
> wanted to post Lego sales, they should do so in .shopping}
>
> One more thing...
> Matt Chiles contacted me via email BEFORE he posted this message because he
> wanted to be sure he did not post incorrectly. I read the group charters and
> made the decision that his For Sale posts would be properly placed in
> .shopping. I recommeneded to Matt that he cross-post single messages in B-S-T
> and .shopping to avoid complaints about double posting and that is exactly what
> Matt has done.
>
> Perhaps this whole situation needs to be discussed again. See you all in
> .admin.general and .admin.terms.
>
> __Kevin Salm__
> Curator, Lugnet marketplace newsgroups
>
> [1] http://news.lugnet.com/market/shopping/?n=1
>
> XFUT: lugnet.admin.terms
>
> .
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Sale at The Vault this week!
|
| (...) posted (...) Tom - as far as I know there has been no official answer as to the proper place to post BrickLink sales info. I think we're getting closer to a ruling :) (URL)To me, .brickshops is more about discussing the running of brickshops, (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
