 | | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) Actually, they're covered under fair use. The parody/satire clause, IIRC. (...) Because I'm not interested in a shitstorm. (...) I'd laugh my ass off. Besides, I've done far (URL) worse> (warning, really messed up adult content) than that (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
Moving back to admin.terms since this is not an off topic debate. The images do not *clearly* violate TOS if they have been moderated. Considering the size and obviousness of the lettering, it can't be argued that the admins didn't see it, and as (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) But aren't those types of edits the right of the creator alone? (...) Why not? (...) No "crime", but put it this way: how would you feel if somebody posted pics of their recreation of (URL) with a lewd caption on it? You might think it's (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) From the TOS: "You agree to not use the Service to: (a) upload, post or otherwise transmit any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
Which secion of the TOS do those images specifically violate? Perhaps I'm missing it, but I didn't see any that those were *clearly* in violation of. Jeff (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
I'm not going to take issue with the rest of this, but stolen? I think Stefan's edits, if anything, highlight the expressive quality of the poses. I wouldn't have posted them, myself, but I don't think they're some kind of crime. Soren (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) Fine fine, do you really need me or anyone to tell you what you did was not cool? No respect for the builder's copy written photos. No respect for the Terms of Service for Brickshelf, Maj.com, or Lugnet. No meaningful comment on the model (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) There is no need to apologize for having fun. That is why we are all here. But it is important that necessary we all have fun playing by the rules. That is what "leg godt" is all about. Some folks are a little more sensitive to "colorful" (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) If you thought it was funny, why reply with criticism? (...) Who says I don't? Soren, for example, is one of my favorite builders, and a person I look up to and admire and turn to for tutelage (is that even a word?), and in fact those are his (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) In fact, it is a direct violation of the TOS. I would suggest that the post be cancelled. Even the images are TOS violations of Maj.com. Conduct such as this is highly unbecoming and very disappointing, Stefan. JOHN (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
