Subject:
|
Re: Message awaiting authentication
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:33:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1112 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.faq, Neb Okla wrote:
> I don't want to use the web client. It's clunky.
>
> With NNTP, I can read posts offline, choose my NNTP client (thus finding a
> UI that is right for me), etc.
>
> Thanks for the info though. Now I know that throwing $10 at lugnet won't
> fix the problem.
>
> I skimmed the discussions below.
>
> I also know that Lugnet members have a username and password. One would
> wonder then why the NNTP service simply doesn't require a user to login?
Replying to this, because I haven't actually seen anyone bring up one of Todd's
original reasons(1):
NNTP authentication does not prevent spoofing your ID for any given message, it
just allows or prevents access to the server. Some [expletive deleted] person
who was spoofing ID's (via NNTP, if I recall, but I might be mistaken) is the
reason authentication became necessary in the first place. Lugnet operated on a
trust system until that trust was violated. Sucks for the rest of us, but there
ya go.
James
1: http://news.lugnet.com/admin/suggestions/?n=642
...top hit in a search of the admin newsgroups for "Lehman password NNTP", BTW
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Message awaiting authentication
|
| (...) Thanks for the link. I like this part, "I'd like to revisit this in a month or two... --Todd" So maybe this is a valid topic for discussion. Anyhow, I don't know why I didn't just do the search myself. Laziness I suppose. I'm sorry, I swear (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
