 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) This is what I meant.. if for whatever reason it's decided that FTX should no longer be allowed in posts, can you at that point - prevent people from including FTX tags? (I suspect not, at least not in an easy to implement but hard to get (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Signature Image Abuse —Brian H. Nielsen
|
| | | | | (...) Turn it around - let people turn off FTX in messages they read. Todd's already contemplating a setting to let people choose to filter out images based on size. How about another option to filter out all FTX formatting? (...) I've always liked (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Signature Image Abuse —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | | (...) or combine the two, and allow people to block (or allow) FTX in messages from specific posters. (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Signature Image Abuse — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) No... although preventing someone from posting with that content type wouldn't be much work if it were administered manually (the same way someone is prevent from posting at all, which is very rare). (...) Yes, trivial. Just commenting out one (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Signature Image Abuse —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) The various discussion has brought up a lot of issues. There has only been momentary reference to pornography, but have you considered that? Since the images are hosted externally, you can't even put someone on moderation since they can make (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
