 | | Enforce .lego.* rules —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | I have noticed for quite a while that we (LUGNET users) have become laxed about what is being posted to .lego.* Based on the ng clarification posted by Todd: (URL) are all (myself included) guilty of posting unnecessarily to these groups. As a (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Enforce .lego.* rules —William R. Ward
|
| | | | (...) This is probably due to the confusion between the .dear-lego and .lego.* rules. I would like to make a more concrete suggestion: get rid of .dear-lego, and create some .lego.* groups that are specifically for discussions among lugnetters about (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | (canceled) — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Enforce .lego.* rules —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Until the *default* web view (not just "an available view", I know it's available) is without subgroups folded in, I'd rather see .dear-lego kept off to the side and less traffic that belongs in .dear-lego misposted to .lego.direct Otherwise (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Enforce .lego.* rules — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | (...) Are you suggesting we put aliases on these pages: (2 URLs) .dear-lego? Because that's a pretty good idea. Do you think the .lego charters could use a brief "normal version" along with the more detailed message about posting there? or would (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Enforce .lego.* rules —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) No, but merely because I hadn't thought of it. I was just suggesting not moving .dear-lego (renamed or not) under .lego so that its content would not get mixed in when one viewed .lego from the web using the default interface. This is (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
