|
Jude Beaudin wrote:
>
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Daniel Crichton writes:
> > Jude Beaudin <shiningblade@rogers.com> wrote:
> > > In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ross Crawford writes:
> > > > This was discussed at some length in this thread
> > > > http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=182 just thought i'd bring
> > > > it up again.
> > > >
> > > > ROSCO
> > >
> > > Does not email authentication kill it being realtime (unless you are a
> > > member signed in)?
> >
> > I believe it was going to be a proper chat system like IRC, so email auth
> > wouldn't come into it.
> >
> > If you were implied sarcasm then I missed it ... too tired :)
> >
> > Dan
>
> No sarcasm intended, I was thinking of identity theft issues.
Some thoughts on chat and identity theft issues:
I wouldn't generally think of NNTP or e-mail as being the clients of
choice for a chat room, I would see logging on through a web client as
being the means of use. Of course this might make chat only available to
members, but it could be set up so you don't need a membership (then
perhaps an icon shows up beside your name in the chat participants which
indicates if you are a member or not). I also don't think of chat
messages as being archived, so there isn't as much problem with identity
theft (in other words, I won't join the chat tomorrow and get all pissed
at you because I read something someone spoofing you posted yesterday).
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Lugnet Chat
|
| (...) I'd make the suggestion that maybe it's only available to members (an added benefit of membership) or at least have a room (or rooms) available to members only, and the identity displayed is the name on your membership page (or an alias (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|