 | | Re: Fantasy group?
|
| After doing some reading and thinking, I feel that a new group is not needed at this time. In fact, its addition may even lead to more harm than good. I thought Frank made some excellent points in this post: (URL) was so good, IMHO, it ought to end (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Fantasy group?
|
| (...) Build.fiction, fantasy, what's the difference? In the long run, I would consider both to really fit in the same categoory, since, they're both fiction, and of course, fantasy can really fit into any genre is you stop to think about it. (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Fantasy group?
|
| (...) build.fiction makes it more clear that the group is open to both SF and fantasy (and romance, and various other "fiction" themes). Of course as you point out, most of what we do is fantasy, and is also fiction, but I think most of us would (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Fantasy group?
|
| LUGNET Admin wrote in message ... (...) needed (...) I don't think it would actually do harm, but I'm OK with it not being created, now that the discussion has clarified where the orphaned Pern thread should be located. <goes back to reading "Skies (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Fantasy group?
|
| (...) I'm not sure what you mean by 'in the long run'... Just to clarify, adding a group called build.fiction would have the intent of attracting posters whose building may be inspired by: TRON, Blade Runner, Hello Kitty, Le Morte D'Arthur, Monty (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Fantasy group?
|
| (...) :) !!!!! Now I want to make some Dr. Seuss MOCs. I'm not quite sure how, but there has to be a way. Bruce (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
