 | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) I agree with John about this. If the LUGNET logo must be in a box, it should at least have more space around it. But I also still highly favor the larger, non-boxed LUGNET logo from (URL) this draft>. On an only somewhat related note... the (...) (18 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) I really like this draft as well, because of the lack of boxes. The only problem with not having a box around it this draft is that the logo gets diluted by the colors passing behind it. On my own somewhat related note... the actual LUGNET (...) (18 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) (URL) Not quite>. ROSCO (18 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) Nice, thanks for the illustration. (...) I can certainly understand the hesitation in thayt regard. (...) There might be some implied favoritism toward the yellow L if we count (URL) this Todd & Suz created image> for anything. But I was more (...) (18 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) It's a good question, Brendan. It's been 8 years and I can't recall exactly what the decision process was, but I do recall we felt that certain orientations looked upside down, while others looked right-side up. I think we looked at 12 (...) (18 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
