 | | Re: those crazy Vikings (Was: Viking Longship)
|
|
(...) LOL well that's all well and good, but according to lego.com (URL) it is actually a theme>. Whether you make it a subset of pirates or not, I think it still should have it's own group ;) ROSCO (trimmed groups) (19 years ago, 20-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: those crazy Vikings (Was: Viking Longship)
|
|
(...) I agree. And not simply because Lego say they are a standalone theme. Once the vikings leave their ships, they are less and less like pirates and more and more like castle types. When we get a few non-maritime viking mocs, it would seem wrong (...) (19 years ago, 20-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: those crazy Vikings (Was: Viking Longship)
|
|
(...) I would personally prefer to see .castle.vikings, or just make it clear that vikings belong in .castle. I really don't think of vikings as part of the pirate theme. I know pirates is kind of dead, but I hate to see all this really non-piratey (...) (19 years ago, 20-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: those crazy Vikings (Was: Viking Longship)
|
|
(...) I tend to agree that .castle.vikings would be better than .pirates.vikings(though I think simple .vikings would be better then either). Historically, though, it seems to have been generally acceptable to post distinctly non-piratey stuff to (...) (19 years ago, 20-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: those crazy Vikings (Was: Viking Longship)
|
|
(...) lugnet.vikings makes the most sense to me. Personally, I don't understand the resistance to creating a new group for it. If we have lugnet.galidor, why not lugnet.vikings? I would've thought a new group for {any} new theme would almost be an (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: those crazy Vikings (Was: Viking Longship)
|
|
(...) I'd like to create .vikings. I hope that will be acceptable. -Suz ~/\~ (^^)/ (19 years ago, 23-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
