Subject:
|
Re: those crazy Vikings (Was: Viking Longship)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:04:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5243 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Richie Dulin wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Frank Filz wrote:
> > Richie Dulin wrote:
> > > So please: .vikings! (or .pirates.vikings or .castle.vikings)
> >
> > I would personally prefer to see .castle.vikings, or just make it clear that
> > vikings belong in .castle. I really don't think of vikings as part of the
> > pirate theme. I know pirates is kind of dead, but I hate to see all this
> > really non-piratey stuff there.
>
> I tend to agree that .castle.vikings would be better than
> .pirates.vikings(though I think simple .vikings would be better then either).
>
> Historically, though, it seems to have been generally acceptable to post
> distinctly non-piratey stuff to .pirates: Frederick der Grosse, Takao, Snottler,
> for example ... ;-)
>
> Cheers
>
> Richie Dulin
lugnet.vikings makes the most sense to me. Personally, I don't understand the
resistance to creating a new group for it. If we have lugnet.galidor, why not
lugnet.vikings? I would've thought a new group for {any} new theme would almost
be an automatic process by now, or at least just done without all this
discussion when someone asks for it. Maybe I'm missing something.
Allister
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: those crazy Vikings (Was: Viking Longship)
|
| (...) I tend to agree that .castle.vikings would be better than .pirates.vikings(though I think simple .vikings would be better then either). Historically, though, it seems to have been generally acceptable to post distinctly non-piratey stuff to (...) (19 years ago, 20-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
