 | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) Okay, I see your point; I can live with the magnifying glass:-) But I draw the line at bullets. It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever. - St. Hubbins JOHN (19 years ago, 20-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) Glad you like the overall look of the mock-up I did, but I should be careful not to take too much credit. I really just moved stuff around that was in Rene's (URL) index-test-2> and subsequent drafts. So any imperfections in the logo shadow (...) (19 years ago, 20-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | RSS feeds for groups
|
|
For archiving; this came via email. --- It would be nice if each newsgroup had its own RSS feed so one could easily tell if it was updated since the last time one checked. --- (19 years ago, 20-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) Actually, it's another of those words where common use has blurred what some would consider the correct usage. Many dictionaries now list it as a noun, eg: (URL) (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) I like it because I think it readily communicates what the icon means: "Search LUGNET". I would color it slightly differently and make the studs show subtly, but that's just a refinement. (...) To me it feels very similar to the way the logo (...) (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) I am little surprised about that, Todd. Actually, I am worrying about the dilution of the LUGNET logo by using it freely within other graphics. It is clever, but I fear too clever by half. Bad branding. .02, JOHN (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) Looks great without the box! BTW, the "shadows" in the logo should be darker versions of the brick colors (e.g., dark blue, dark red, dark yellow) instead of black. But in terms of a mock-up, that's just a minor point. (...) Another minor (...) (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) I'd be curious to see what it looks like with the spotlight coming from the upper-left, as John suggests. --Todd (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) John, I really like these a lot -- especially the Links icon. Only thing I'd change is making the colors a little more saturated, darker. --Todd (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) Yeah, let's be careful not to lose the studs. --Todd (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) It's a good question, Brendan. It's been 8 years and I can't recall exactly what the decision process was, but I do recall we felt that certain orientations looked upside down, while others looked right-side up. I think we looked at 12 (...) (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
Sorry, the link to the full size image did not seem to work. Here's the link again: (URL) -Brendan (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
Hi, Rene. I put together a mock-up image of my suggestions for tweaks to the new LUGNET front page. I am using (URL) index-test-2> as a basis since I prefer the overall look of that draft to any of the ones since then. (Not that the (URL) latest (...) (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) ondrew (19 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) Rene- The latest draft seems "broken" viewed with Mozilla Firefox 1.5.0.8. Specifically, the picure for the SCLTC story (gee, that's a coincidence!) continuously appears and pierces through the black border on the bottom of the SCLTC story (...) (19 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) Nice, thanks for the illustration. (...) I can certainly understand the hesitation in thayt regard. (...) There might be some implied favoritism toward the yellow L if we count (URL) this Todd & Suz created image> for anything. But I was more (...) (19 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) (URL) Not quite>. ROSCO (19 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) (19 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) I really like this draft as well, because of the lack of boxes. The only problem with not having a box around it this draft is that the logo gets diluted by the colors passing behind it. On my own somewhat related note... the actual LUGNET (...) (19 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) I agree with John about this. If the LUGNET logo must be in a box, it should at least have more space around it. But I also still highly favor the larger, non-boxed LUGNET logo from (URL) this draft>. On an only somewhat related note... the (...) (19 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
