 | | Re: Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
(...) I'm interested in how the Wiki and LUGNET can work together. more later. -Suz (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ross Crawford wrote: A wiki logically does not need a group for discussion as a wiki can handle it itself...but yes a lugnet group for BrickWiki may be useful (who say I'm logical ?). (...) good Didier (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
Maybe under lugnet.publish? ROSCO (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-numbered sets in the database (Re: Book Reviews, feedback)
|
|
(...) Yes Dave is right. Dave and Eric Strand have been digging up lots of obscure Samsonite sets that were sold by department stores. As an example a 1969 Sears catalog shows set #49-C-4418, which is a 335 piece basic set. Not exactly a user (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-numbered sets in the database (Re: Book Reviews, feedback)
|
|
(...) I would also like to see non-numbered 'official' sets in the database. Your example included the Weetabix sets, but there are other promo sets not in the DB. Life Puppet, for instance. Also, there are the sets sold through department stores, (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-numbered sets in the database (Re: Book Reviews, feedback)
|
|
(...) I agree Jojo, There are a few regular Lego sets that have rather strange numbers. The (Denmark Only) education sets of the 1960's are an example. You have "Terapi" sets "I", "II" and "III", and "S/8" sets and "K/12" sets. Gary Istok (21 years ago, 18-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Non-numbered sets in the database (Re: Book Reviews, feedback)
|
|
Hello! Sorry for revitalising an aged thread... (...) The main problem with the database probably is its strict limitation to numbers. While I like set numbers and actually prefer them over set names (because numbers are universal while names differ (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
Hmm, it seems more and more folks are creating FTX posts with FTX hard new lines without a real new line. If these are being created in the web editor, could it reasonably force a real new line? It's slowly getting to the point that NNTP access to (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
(...) Like I said, I'm not playing to the cheap seats. Newsreaders Be Darned! Honestly, it never even occurred to me. I've accessed LUGNET via the web ever since I started reading it, and the foibles of the newsreader interface have been, at best, (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
(...) Out of curiosity, when you wrote the post, how did you add in the newlines? That is, when I'm writing a post in FTX, I almost NEVER use the character for newlines. Instead, I forget. This causes problems like this: Pieces That Are Awesome: - (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
(...) Ah, yes--now I see. I manually numbered my list of sage suggestions without realizing that an FTX option was available. Thanks Dave! (21 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
(...) (URL) (FTX User Guide) has more info. * = bullet + = numbered - = numbered but in descending order Hope that helps. (21 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
(...) What's a list element? Dave! (21 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
(...) Are you looking at the FTX post, or the raw form? The raw URL is: (URL) (21 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
(...) snip (...) I see the full post, as I do with the link below - maybe the truncation problem is at your end? (...) FTX DOES require newlines before list elements. The problem here is that Dave chose not to use list elements. ROSCO (21 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
(...) Well, I figured that'd be quicker than doing the conversion every time. Disk space is cheap. CPU isn't as much. (...) My old code? I wrote something for work that translated html into textural tables, but can't use that... Plus, tables with (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
(...) But that means you need to store two copies of FTX posts - one converted, and one not. Not that that's a bad thing, but it's something to think about. As for tables, we'll have to use your old code (or to write new code) that will convert the (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
(...) I don't think I'd change FTX-- I think I'd vote for an FTX->plain text converter, and run that on any FTX posts. Then, when someone requests the post via NNTP or SMTP, that's the post they get. It would probably do things like: - remove square (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Raw post display broken
|
|
(...) Interesting. There's a few hits to it in the http log, which all come up as status 200 (OK), but strangely it looks like yours came up with a SLIGHTLY smaller byte count. Not enough to indicate the truncating that you saw, but enough to be (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Please consider fixing FTX...
|
|
(...) Um, looks ok when I look at it? (...) I do agree that FTX needs to degrade much more nicely into plain text than it does. If we change FTX though, we'll need to think of what to do with older FTX posts. (21 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
