 | | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Some old-timers may remember (URL) this thread>. --Todd (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) True but it seems that (although I admit I have little experience with collaborative filtering systems) revenge and retribution would be much easier to pull off. For example, I dislike someone so in revenge I get 20 of my friends to downcheck (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) That defies the purpose, Tim. That's still saying an admin, a person chosen for ambiguous reasons, should have power. Those reasons could be for being a loudmouth, for being the guy who happened to be there, the guy who other admins felt was (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) That's okay--say the community isn't enlightened about certain topics. If they unvote "important" topics, it can't be that "important" as a result. What that really says is, we're gonna institute a mechanized form of mob rule. If it's gonna be (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) That could be overcome by a mechanism where admins can block a message from being downchecked. -Tim (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
