 | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —David Arnon
|
| | | (...) I have little experience with news group and common Internet rules and I've been reading LUGNET only using the web interface [1]. Maybe someone with more knowledge will disagree, but at least to me the whole group hierarchy carries also an (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | David Arnon <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> wrote in message news:GAsMA6.8CH@lugnet.com... (...) posting (...) exactly (...) Keep on postin'!!! We'll let you know if you do anything "un-toward"!! As for the technic / bionicle thing, I'm pretty much (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Looks like we're in the minority, David. Oh well. 8?) ROSCO (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Ronan Webb
|
| | | | How do I put this politely ... bionicle is NOT technic. Get it outta here. Ronan Ross Crawford <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message news:GAsMsG.9Mr@lugnet.com... (...) but (...) you, (...) I (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Steve Lane
|
| | | | (...) Why do you need to be polite about it? next time use proper swear words :-) Steve (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
