 | | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
|
(...) Right... so users promise that the info they give about themselves is true, but not that information in particular posts is. Since we're coming up on April, I guess I think that's a good thing! (even though I am convinced I have "sucker" taped (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
(...) Mabie what needs to happen is that lugnet.loc.us.ny.ny.man and possibly lugnet.loc.us.ny.ny even should disappear altogether. The whole loc heriachy needs a rethink IMHO. (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
(...) But what I'd really like is the look of (URL) on the top and left side of the page but with (URL) for the messages (brief, technic ONLY, no subgroups). And have some way to get this look when I'm at (URL) and click on "Technic" group. I am (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
(...) Are you saying that when I wanted some info on the LEGO stores in Manhattan I should have posted to: lugnet.loc.us.ny.ny.man, lugnet.loc.us.ny.ny, lugnet.loc.us.ny, lugnet.loc.us ? I'm not an expert on the posting rules... What will be the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
(...) _and_ (...) post (...) I'm (...) is (...) I usually only read the technic news group so if I understand correctly skipping the bionicle, roborider and slizer sub group will be equivalent to the "view plain" option of the technic group which I (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
David Arnon <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> wrote in message news:GAs7xK.Mus@lugnet.com... (...) appear (...) and (...) _and_ (...) post (...) group (...) I'm (...) choice is (...) Unfortunately, the whole newsgroup system (not just Lugnet's (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
(...) You might want to have a look at the "skip filter" mechanism (URL) see if adding -.bionicle to your skip-filter does the trick for you. (I'm not promising that it will solve your problem, but it might make things a bit less annoying.) --Todd (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
(...) Same here! I even posted about it a while ago. (...) all (...) "View (...) That's true, I've used that option for a while but I had the feeling I'm missing something - If someone posts something that deals with bionicles _and_ in technic (and (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface "quirk"?
|
|
(...) It could probably go in either, but since this is news-related, I'm more comfortable with it being in the .nntp group. If you're talking about the TLC filter, that's pretty much entirely and .nntp thing. (...) Ya, it's a quirk (and I find it (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: AOL and lugnet.
|
|
(...) No, the LUGNET newsgroups aren't syndicated, sorry. (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | AOL and lugnet.
|
|
Is thier a way to set up Lugnet in AOL's internal newsgroup feature? Rick (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
|
(...) I'm not aware of anything in the TOS/T&C[1] about this either. Alex may be thinking of the news-posting setup form[2], where there is a checkbox that says: "I swear that all the information I am submitting on this page is correct and that I am (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
|
(...) I'm curious where this statement is, I can't find it. Frank (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface "quirk"?
|
|
(...) It's issues like this which are why I end up always coming back to using a news reader as my primary reading tool. When I do browse posts through the web interface, I always open the post in another window, so I can return to the original list (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Newsgroup for Harry Potter!
|
|
A new newsgroup for LEGO®/Harry Potter® has been created. CHARTER/PURPOSE ===...=== -> lugnet.harrypotter (group): LEGO®/Harry Potter®: products (information, opinions, reviews, licensing issues, etc.); building (settings, contexts, characters, (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface "quirk"?
|
|
(...) Has anyone else seen this behavior? Any comments? ++Lar (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Official vs. unofficial postings
|
|
(...) I think that's a great idea. (...) You *could* do that. but I think the message is more important than the package. What matters more to me is the signature rather than how it got posted... (...) I'm not sure I would do that. I think you need (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: New Scenes at BrickDreams, and Thanks
|
|
(...) It's fine, but you might want to set the 'Followup-To:' header to point at lugnet.cad.ray if you expect the discussion to wander in that direction (like, let's say, in-depth discussion of the tools you used and things like that). Otherwise, (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Official vs. unofficial postings
|
|
(...) I've been giving this a lot of thought, and upon your recommendations, Larry, I've decided to change the way I post. I haven't decided on an official LUGNET admin sig yet, but for starters I'll definitely be making the 'From:' header be an (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | REQ: New Group(s)---lugnet.off-topic.test Heirarchy
|
|
G'day Todd, I am requesting that some additional "test" groups be established to facilitate testing of cross-posts, follow-ups, trims, etc. While am I not having any particular technical problems with these techniques, there are some nuances of (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
