 | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
David Arnon <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> wrote in message news:GAs7xK.Mus@lugnet.com... (...) appear (...) and (...) _and_ (...) post (...) group (...) I'm (...) choice is (...) Unfortunately, the whole newsgroup system (not just Lugnet's (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
(...) You might want to have a look at the "skip filter" mechanism (URL) see if adding -.bionicle to your skip-filter does the trick for you. (I'm not promising that it will solve your problem, but it might make things a bit less annoying.) --Todd (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
(...) Same here! I even posted about it a while ago. (...) all (...) "View (...) That's true, I've used that option for a while but I had the feeling I'm missing something - If someone posts something that deals with bionicles _and_ in technic (and (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface "quirk"?
|
|
(...) It could probably go in either, but since this is news-related, I'm more comfortable with it being in the .nntp group. If you're talking about the TLC filter, that's pretty much entirely and .nntp thing. (...) Ya, it's a quirk (and I find it (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: AOL and lugnet.
|
|
(...) No, the LUGNET newsgroups aren't syndicated, sorry. (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | AOL and lugnet.
|
|
Is thier a way to set up Lugnet in AOL's internal newsgroup feature? Rick (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
|
(...) I'm not aware of anything in the TOS/T&C[1] about this either. Alex may be thinking of the news-posting setup form[2], where there is a checkbox that says: "I swear that all the information I am submitting on this page is correct and that I am (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
|
(...) I'm curious where this statement is, I can't find it. Frank (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface "quirk"?
|
|
(...) It's issues like this which are why I end up always coming back to using a news reader as my primary reading tool. When I do browse posts through the web interface, I always open the post in another window, so I can return to the original list (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Newsgroup for Harry Potter!
|
|
A new newsgroup for LEGO®/Harry Potter® has been created. CHARTER/PURPOSE ===...=== -> lugnet.harrypotter (group): LEGO®/Harry Potter®: products (information, opinions, reviews, licensing issues, etc.); building (settings, contexts, characters, (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface "quirk"?
|
|
(...) Has anyone else seen this behavior? Any comments? ++Lar (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Official vs. unofficial postings
|
|
(...) I think that's a great idea. (...) You *could* do that. but I think the message is more important than the package. What matters more to me is the signature rather than how it got posted... (...) I'm not sure I would do that. I think you need (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: New Scenes at BrickDreams, and Thanks
|
|
(...) It's fine, but you might want to set the 'Followup-To:' header to point at lugnet.cad.ray if you expect the discussion to wander in that direction (like, let's say, in-depth discussion of the tools you used and things like that). Otherwise, (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Official vs. unofficial postings
|
|
(...) I've been giving this a lot of thought, and upon your recommendations, Larry, I've decided to change the way I post. I haven't decided on an official LUGNET admin sig yet, but for starters I'll definitely be making the 'From:' header be an (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | REQ: New Group(s)---lugnet.off-topic.test Heirarchy
|
|
G'day Todd, I am requesting that some additional "test" groups be established to facilitate testing of cross-posts, follow-ups, trims, etc. While am I not having any particular technical problems with these techniques, there are some nuances of (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.design
|
|
(...) Hmm - actually I think lugnet.build.theory might be a better name, in keeping with .market.theory The idea being to have a group that talks about the design ideas in an abstract way without being full of MOC announcements & praise (which is (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.design
|
|
(...) OK, I'll bite... What is wrong with .build? Maybe you arn't going into the subgroups of build? There is .build.arch for architecture, and .build.mecha for Mecha etc.? Sorry but just suggesting a group without expaining Why it is a good idea (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.design
|
|
(...) Not a bad idea... but this should go in lugnet.admin.nntp I believe... However, as a hierarchicalist, I'd suggest lugnet.build.design instead. FUT: lugnet.admin.nntp (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
(...) Definitely not 8?( However that is only a feature of the web interface. Viewing news.lugnet.com/technic by default actually displays the technic group and all it's sub-groups. You can filter out all the sub-groups by clicking on the "View (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Reducing the level of chatter in lugnet.lego.direct
|
|
(...) What browser was used? With Netscape at least, I regularly see it give up after a transaction is only partly done (I've never experienced this during a post, only during a read). The more I experience HTTP, the more I feel it's a broken (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
