 | | Re: A letter to Todd —Mark Papenfuss
| | | | (...) Mark Papenfuss, thats who I know I am, never claimed to be anything official, or anything more than Mark Papenfuss. Were you unclear about who I am? (...) If you have been paying attention, Todd's response rate is below 50%, he is a busy man - (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: A letter to Todd —Tim Courtney
| | | | | (...) Mark, settle down. You're being a bit too demanding here, even though you might not see it. You posted a public letter, so you should expect others to reply. If you didn't want other replies, then don't post publicly. You can't get upset when (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: A letter to Todd —Mark Papenfuss
| | | | | (...) True, point taken - I was more to borrow a word "grated" that the reply had really nothing to do with the post - I know it would be impossible to keep people posting a reply to it, and posting that would only make people reply more - which it (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: A letter to Todd —Christopher L. Weeks
| | | | | (...) Uh oh. Now the uproar is going to continue because you're only allowed to profane on LUGNET if you're in the good graces of the powers that be. And you're not. So I predict your posting privs will be yanked and you'll scream about being (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
