| |
FYI, a filter was installed today on the news server to accept lego.com
postings (i.e., LEGO Company employees using their official email address)
in the following groups only:
lugnet.lego
lugnet.lego.announce
lugnet.lego.direct
(essentially the lugnet.lego.* hierarchy)
lugnet.off-topic.test
(special case for testing news client setup/configuration)
LEGO Company employees posting in an unofficial capacity (i.e., as an AFOL
from a personal non-LEGO email address) may, of course, still post anywhere
that any other AFOL can post.
Additionally, the LUGNET news server will now accept postings in the
lugnet.lego.announce group from any LEGO employee using their official LEGO
address, without prior approval from the LUGNET news server. (In the past,
a special switch had to be enabled on a person-by-person basis for this
group, whether or not someone was a LEGO employee.) Non-LEGO-employees
still need special approval to post to lugnet.lego.announce.
--News admin
|
|
Message has 6 Replies:
 | | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
| (...) So can they not post in the Dear Lego thread? If not then that just adds onto the list of things that makes no sense to me. Or am I reading this wrong? Mark P Who is still waiting for an example of how Lego 'clutters' up threads (23 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
| (...) Hmm. Personally, I think this is entirely misguided, in the following sense: if you're going to restrict postings at all, I'd much rather see less _non_-Lego employee traffic in e.g. lugnet.lego.direct. What exactly is the problem you think (...) (23 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
