 | | Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio —Jeff Johnston
|
| | | I think that as more people buy and begin using LEGO Studio, there are going to be more films posted and talked about on LUGNET. I'd like to propose the following new groups: lugnet.studios - the 'theme group', for discussion of the sets themselves. (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) How about either lugnet.build.movies or lugnet.publish.movies? I'd lean toward lugnet.build.movies. Steve (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I think those names sound like a good start, but if one is a subset of the other (that is, both are for movies but one is more general than the other), then they ought to be named lugnet.x and lugnet.x.y rather than lugnet.x and lugnet.x.y -- (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I gotta remember that one!! (...) Not really. Tell me the difference between lugnet.x and lugnet.x.y (the first one) and lugnet.x and lugnet.x.y (the second one) if you would... But I agree with your thesis, I think. Specific usually ought to (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) LOL! OOops, too much coffee this morning. It's not my fault. I just woke up. :-) I meant lugnet.x & lugnet.x.y vs. lugnet.x & lugnet.y, naturally. :-) (...) That's what I'm afraid of. There's so much overlap, but each one gets into specific (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) I'd say that putting it under .publish is probably the best place to stick it. I think .publish has been pretty well pinned down as the best place for photography techniques. It's also a place acceptable to announce web pages (though it's hard (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | (...) Only in your head... ;-) (...) So what you are saying is we should have a group like .images then sub groups like .images.movies, .images.photography, etc... and links on the .images html page to .cad.ray et al? You know what Todd this kinda (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I agree with this. (...) Not a bad idea, no matter what ends up happening. Whereever there's a "missing group", add a link to the place where the group actually exists. (...) Yeah, that sounds right. Steve (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
