Subject:
|
Re: Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:06:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
291 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Jude Beaudin wrote:
> I think you should keep Studios in the theme portion of the hierarchy and the
> movies in the other portion (non-theme). As far as .cad.ray is concerned, it
> can stay where it is. Yes, there will always be an overlap between the groups
> but you need to draw a line and established groups should not be effected too
> much. After all, if .cad.ray is removed out of .cad then .cad is incomplete.
I agree with this.
> Then of course you can add links to your heart's desire on the .publish group
> html page to all of your creations.
Not a bad idea, no matter what ends up happening. Whereever there's a
"missing group", add a link to the place where the group actually exists.
> .publish becomes the root and you add .publish.movies and .publish.photo and
> add a link on the .publish html to .cad.ray
Yeah, that sounds right.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio
|
| (...) Only in your head... ;-) (...) So what you are saying is we should have a group like .images then sub groups like .images.movies, .images.photography, etc... and links on the .images html page to .cad.ray et al? You know what Todd this kinda (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
