 | | Serious group requests —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | I've already brought up a newsgroup for women, which I think (among many other people in the community) is a great idea. I just thought of another group in which I would hope could see some posting action: Lugnet.people.nlso - for SO's of Lego (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Serious group requests —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Well, even though I used a smiley, my with-pets suggestion was semi-serious. There have been (URL) posts in the past regarding pet problems>, (URL) pet-related MOCs> and even (URL) MOCs involving pets>, all of which would, IMO, fit well in (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Serious group requests —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Good suggestion. I think the group would also be useful for AFOLs to share advice on how to deal with issues and concerns of their NLSOs... (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Serious group requests — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I think that's a great idea too. Good call! Would there be a use for a .men group as well (with men already being the vast majority here)? Is political correctness the only reason to create a .men group in parallel, or would it actually find (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Serious group requests —Terry Prosper
|
| | | | | (...) I think it would be as useful for men to have their own newsgroup as it would be for women. I don't understand the use for any of them, since I believe the LEGO experience is not influenced by sexual identity, but hey, if we're gonna have (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Serious group requests —David Eaton
|
| | | | | (...) Agree! (...) I'd guess not, until it really becomes requested. To be honest, I'd probably prefer to see a .christian newsgroup before I saw a .men newsgroup, just because ".men" speaks to roughly 95% of the LUGNET population (going by (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Serious group requests —Alfred Speredelozzi
|
| | | | (...) that, but she thinks its strange the number of heated arguements we have here. Granted, she is biased by the fact that she's married to someone fairly reactionary, so she see's a skewed version of things. However, even if I were a mostly (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Serious group requests —Paul Sinasohn
|
| | | | I have a question / suggestion. Why not change the default settings on the main message display list to include only theme and local groups? The thought behind this is to create a kid-friendly default view of LUGNET. I know this opens a lot of worm (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
